| Source: Eugene C. Roehlkepartain, Search Institute, December 2007 | ||
| Thousands of community-based organizations engage millions of young people in service and service-learning. Though research in K-12 and higher education settings shows a wide range of benefits of effective service-learning (RMC Research, 2006), much less is known about the actual value or benefits of service and service-learning in community-based settings. This fact sheet highlights some of the emerging knowledge in this field based on theory, process evaluations, and field wisdom—knowing that more rigorous research is needed. | ||
| What Are Community-Based Organizations? | ||
| There are many kinds of community-based organizations, and there are many ways to define their scope. For purposes of this overview, community-based organizations include: | ||
|
||
| Service and service-learning take many different forms in community settings. One study identified, for example, 11 different models in school-based programs and 15 different forms in community-based programs. These include a series of programs on a specific issue, short-term projects, summer programs, crisis response activities, and youth advisory and planning groups (Shumer, 1993). Hence, one size clearly does not fit all.
|
||
| Benefits for Youth Participants | ||
| Youth who participate in high-quality community-based service-learning are likely to benefit in a number of ways (Chung, 1997; Coe-Regan et al, in press; Lewis-Charp et al., 2003; Tannenbaum, S. C., 2007; and YMCA of the USA, 2004): | ||
|
||
| Benefits for Youth Development Organizations | ||
| Youth development organizations and after-school programs that use service-learning can benefit from this strategy in a number of ways: | ||
|
||
| It is also noteworthy that effective service-learning practices are closely aligned with effective youth development practices A major report from the National Research Council and Institute of Medicine (2002) identified eight factors in community programs that facilitate positive youth development: | ||
|
||
| Done well, service-learning programs addresses all these factors and becomes a particularly useful strategy for increasing self-efficacy and integrating family, school, and community efforts. (Also see Benson et al., 2006; Scales & Roehlkepartain, 2004). | ||
| Benefits to Organizations that Utilize Young People as Volunteers | ||
| Community-based organizations that engage young people in service and service-learning point to the following kinds of benefits (Chung, 1997, Roehlkepartain, 1995; Naughton, 2000; Melchoir, 1998; reinforced by the general research on the benefits of all types of volunteers identified in: Urban Institute, 2004): | ||
|
||
| Benefits for Service Recipients, Communities, and Society | ||
| Beyond the young people the organizations directly involve , community-based service-learning benefits the people served, their communities, and, ultimately, society: | ||
|
||
| Benefits Don’t Come Automatically | ||
| The benefits outlined above are not automatic or universal. The specific benefits or impact will vary, depending on the focus, scope, and quality of a particular service or service-learning experience. And, based on other research, it is likely that the benefits are stronger (particularly for young people) for service-learning than for volunteering or community service. Thus, integrating core elements of effective service-learning is key to reaping these and other benefits . Among these core elements of effective practice are the following themes (RMC Research, 2007. Also see Naughton, 2000; and Mantooth & Hamilton, 2004): | ||
|
||
| Conclusion | ||
Community-based service-learning does not receive the kind of public attention that service-learning receives in education. Yet it offers significant benefits to society, to young people, and to participating institutions. Lawrence Neil Bailis and colleagues (2005) write:Schools are not the only institutions that educate our young people, and community-based organizations can be far more than the ‘stage’ that schools use to deliver the service-learning programs that they develop. Kindergarten-through-twelfth-grade schooling is only one format for ‘education’ where young people gain the knowledge, skills, attitudes, and aspirations they will need to become successful adults [p. 3]. |
||
| References | ||
| Bailis, L. N., Shields, T., Henning, A., and Neal, M. (2005). Profiles of community-based service-learning in the United States. St. Paul, MN: National Youth Leadership Council. Downloaded from http://www.nylc.org/rc_downloaddetail.cfm?emoid=14:149. Benson, P. L., P. C. Scales, S. F. Hamilton, and A. Sesma, Jr. 2006. Positive youth development: Theory, research and applications. In Handbook of child psychology, 6th ed., Vol. 1, Theoretical models of human development, ed. W. Damon and R.M. Lerner, 894-941. New York: John Wiley. Chung, A. N. (1997). Service as a strategy in out-of-school time: A how-to manual. Washington, DC: Corporation for National Service. Download from http://nationalserviceresources.org/learns/service-ost. Coe-Regan, J. R., & O’Donnell, J. (2006). Best practices for integrating technology and service learning in a youth development program, Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 3, 201-220. Lewis-Charp, H., HanhCao Yu, H., Soukamneuth, S., & Lacoe, J. (2003) Extending the reach of youth development through civic activism: Outcomes of the Youth Leadership for Development Initiative. Oakland, CA: Innovation Center for Community and Youth Development. Mantooth, L. J., & Hamilton, M. P. (2004). 4-H service learning standard and best practice guide. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service. Download from http://www.utextension.utk.edu/4h/SOS/resources/index.htm. Melchior, A. (1998). National evaluation of Learn and Serve America school and community-based programs. Washington, D.C.: Corporation for National and Community Service. Mohamed, I. (2001). Notes from a program officer: The case for youth engagement. In Mohamed, I., & Wheeler, W. (Eds.). Broadening the bounds of youth development: Youth as engaged citizens. Chevy Chase, MD: The Innovation Center for Community and Youth Development and The Ford Foundation, and New York: Ford Foundation. Mohamed, I., & Wheeler, W. (Eds.) (2001). Broadening the bounds of youth development: Youth as engaged citizens. Chevy Chase, MD: The Innovation Center for Community and Youth Development and The Ford Foundation, and New York: Ford Foundation. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine (2002). Community programs to promote youth development: Committee on community-level programs for youth (J. Eccles & J. A. Gootman, Eds.) [Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Children, Youth and Families]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Naughton, S. (2000). Youth and communities helping each other: Community-based organizations using service-learning as a strategy during after-school time. Washington, DC: Corporation for National Service. RMC Research Corporation (2006). Impacts of service-learning on participating K-12 students. Scotts Valley, CA: National Service-Learning Clearinghouse. http://www.servicelearning.org/instant_info/fact_sheets/k-12_facts/impacts/index.php. RMC Research Corporation (2007). Improving outcomes for K-12 service-learning participants. Scotts Valley, CA: National Service-Learning Clearinghouse, 2007. Downloaded from http://www.servicelearning.org/instant_info/fact_sheets/k-12_facts/improving_outcomes/index.php. Roehlkepartain, E. C. (1995). Everyone wins when youth serve. Washington, DC: Points of Light Foundation. Scales, P. C., & Roehlkepartain, E. C. (2004) Service to other: A “gateway asset” for school success and healthy development. In Kielsmeier, J., & Neal, M, & McKinnon, M. (Eds.) Growing to greatness 2004: The state of service-learning in the United States (pp. 26-32). St. Paul, MN: National Youth Leadership Council. Shumer, R. (1993). Describing Service-Learning: A Delphi Study. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Vocational and Technical Education. Tannenbaum, S. C. (2007). Tandem pedagogy: Embedding service-learning into an after-school program. Journal of Experiential Education 29 (2), 111-125. Urban Institute (2004). Volunteer management capacity in America’s charities and congregations: A briefing report. Washington, D.C.: Author. YMCA of the USA (2004). The YMCA service-learning guide: A tool for enriching the member, the participant, the YMCA and the community (2nd ed.). Chicago: Author. |
||
| © 2007 Learn and Serve America’s National Service-Learning Clearinghouse. Photocopying for nonprofit educational purposes is permitted. | ||



