| Source: Tanis Vye Mihalynuk & Sarena D. Seifer, Community Campus Partnerships for Health, September 2002; Updated: NSLC Staff, October 2004 | ||
| Introduction | ||
| Partnerships serve as the foundation of service-learning programs in higher education. These partnerships can exist in different configurations depending on the nature of the program: between faculty and community agency staff, between academic institution and community agency, between student and community agency client, faculty and student, and so forth. This document focuses on service-learning partnerships between faculty and community agency staff, and between academic institution and community agency. It is written for administrators, faculty and staff from colleges and universities who seek to strengthen their service-learning partnerships. You may wish to consult the related tribal NSLC fact sheet on "Building Effective Partnerships for Service-Learning" | ||
| As you review this document, consider the following questions: | ||
| ||
| Developing Relationships | ||
| Forging service-learning partnerships can be challenging, but fortunately there are principles and best practices that can make the task less daunting. An initial step is the development of relationships with key individuals within community-based organizations. There are many ways to do this; below are a few suggestions to get you started: | ||
| ||
| Assessing Assets and Needs | ||
| Conducting a thoughtful assessment of the assets and needs that community agencies and academic institutions can each contribute to the service-learning experience is time well spent. Several useful tools for conducting such assessments are available on this website. | ||
| Assess community assets and needs for service-learning. For example, which community-based organizations and collaboratives already have partnerships with the campus that can form a foundation from which to build new relationships? What unmet community needs or concerns lend themselves well to student involvement through service-learning? | ||
| Assess campus assets and needs for faculty, staff and student involvement in the local community. For example, what opportunities exist among faculty, staff and students for community service, service-learning, collaborative evaluation and research? What institutional goals and objectives might be enhanced by relationships with local community-based organizations and collaboratives? How might community members and representatives contribute to policy decisions within the institution, such as serving on admissions and curriculum committees? | ||
| Asking these questions early in the development of service-learning partnerships can help uncover opportunities and strategies for success. | ||
| Choosing Partners | ||
| You should consider what agency characteristics may be important to the success of a particular service-learning experience. For example, | ||
| ||
| Developing Principle-Centered, Ethical Partnerships | ||
| Community-Campus Partnerships for Health's 9 principles of partnership can help guide and inform the development of service-learning partnerships. We recommend using the principles as an outline to follow when beginning serious discussions with partners as the service-learning experience is designed, implemented and evaluated. A brief illustrative article on each partnership appears on the CCPH website. | ||
| Ethical dilemmas and implications inherent in service-learning partnerships must also be considered. For example, one ethical obligation of faculty members who design service-learning experiences for their students is to avoid harm or burden to the community. This obligation raises such questions as: | ||
| ||
| A particularly helpful article that delineates the ethical
dilemmas and issues that commonly arise in community-based
education of all types (including service-learning) is Quinn SC, Gamble D, Denham A. (2001) Ethics and community-based education: balancing respect for the community with professional preparation. Family & Community Health. Jan;23(4):9-23 (see abstract below). | ||
| Negotiating Formal Partnership Agreements | ||
| Codifying a relationship in writing can serve many useful purposes, including: ensuring that all partners have a shared understanding of the nature and extent of their work together, holding all partners accountable for the roles and responsibilities they have agreed to and clarifying legal obligations and the management of risk. We recommend that at a minimum, written partnership agreements include the following components: | ||
| ||
| Click here to view a sample checklist for a partnership agreement. | ||
| Incorporating Partnerships into All Aspects of Service-Learning | ||
| Community partners and actions intended to strengthen partnerships can be incorporated into all aspects of service-learning: student recruitment, student orientation, community service, reflection, faculty development, curriculum development, and assessment & improvement. Examples for each aspect of service-learning are provided below. | ||
| Student Recruitment | ||
| ||
| Student Orientation | ||
| ||
| Reflection | ||
| ||
| Community Service | ||
| ||
| Faculty Development | ||
| ||
| Curriculum Development | ||
| ||
| Assessment and Improvement | ||
| ||
| Resources | ||
| The following non-exhaustive list of resources, including books, journal articles and web sites, is intended to inform the development of sustainable service-learning partnerships. partnerships between communities and higher education institutions. Please note that there is a wealth of literature on community-university partnerships not specific to service-learning that are not included here. We also encourage you to peruse the extensive holdings of the National Service-Learning Clearinghouse. | ||
| Annotated Print Resources | ||
| American Hospital Association, Tools for Change,
Community Partnership Development Resource Module, American
Hospital Association, Chicago, Ill: 1994. This publication offers references and resources to assist in the development of partnerships between leaders from community-based organizations and institutions, with a specific focus on improving community health status. The module provides abstracts of selected reading on community partnership development, descriptions of additional resources on the issue, and a profile of innovative practices. | ||
| Arches, J., Powerful partnerships, Journal of
Community Practice, 2001, 9(2), 15-30. Using a multi-cultural, inter-generational partnership model, undergraduate students participated in a service-learning collaborative project with immigrant and refugee youths from three geographically distinct community agencies. Recognizing the multiple issues facing newcomers to this country, the collaborative attempted to teach community problem solving and cross cultural leadership skills while promoting civic participation. The refugee youths identified a problem area: the public education system, including accessing services personal rights. Students worked as partners conducting needs assessments, researching information and creating a booklet for use by parents and students. In addition to meeting specifically identified needs, the project heightened ethnic pride and inter-generational understanding for all participants. | ||
| Bringle, R.G. and J.A. Hatcher, Campus-Community
Partnerships: The Terms of Engagement, Journal of Social
Issues, 2002, 58(3), 503-516. The emergence of service learning in higher education and the renewed emphasis on community involvement presents colleges and universities with opportunities to develop campus-community partnerships for the common good. These partnerships can leverage both campus and community resources to address critical issues in local communities. Campus-community partnerships are a series of interpersonal relationships between (a) campus administrators, faculty, staff and students and (b) community leaders, agency personnel and members of communities. The phases of relationships (e.g., initiation, development, maintenance, dissolution) and the dynamics of relationships (e.g., exchanges, equity, distribution of power) are explored to provide service learning instructors and campus personnel with a clearer understanding of how to develop campus-community partnerships. | ||
| Buchanan, D.R., Building Academic-Community Linkages for
Health Promotion: A Case Study in Massachusetts, Am J Health
Promo, 1996, 10(4), 262-269. Using select practice variables from Rothman's typology of models of community organization, this case study analyzes potential sources of conflict in collaborations between academic institutions and community coalitions. Based on different socialization experiences and organizational expectations, the goals, assumptions, basic change strategies, salient practitioner roles, conceptions of the client population, and client roles of the respective organizations were found to differ between these two partners and to be a source of chronic, unproductive tensions in consortium deliberations. The article concludes with recommendations for facilitating the development of more mutually trustworthy academic-community linkages to achieve public health promotion goals, including (1) developing a greater awareness of the initial assumptions of academic and community partners and (2) developing a more highly integrated model of community-based public health. | ||
| Campus Compact, Benchmarks for Campus/Community
Partnerships, 2002. Outlines the essential features of successful campus/ community partnerships as defined by campus and community representatives at a 1998 Wingspread conference. The publication describes partnerships in terms of three ongoing processes-designing partnerships, building relationships, and sustaining partnerships over time. www.compact.org | ||
| Cauley, K., Principle 1: Partners have agreed upon mission, values, goals and measurable outcomes for the partnership, In Seifer, S.D. and Connors, K. (eds), Partnership Perspectives, 2000, Issue 2, Volume 1, Community Campus Partnerships for Health, San Francisco, CA. http://depts.washington.edu/ccph/principles.html#principles | ||
| Connors, K. and M. Prelip, Principle 3: The partnership builds upon identified strengths and assets, but also addresses areas that need improvement, In Seifer, S.D. and Connors, K. (eds), Partnership Perspectives, 2000, Issue 2, Volume 1, Community Campus Partnerships for Health, San Francisco, CA. http://depts.washington.edu/ccph/principles.html#principles | ||
| Connolly, C., Principle 4: The partnership balances the power among partners to be shared, In Seifer, S.D. and Connors, K. (eds), Partnership Perspectives, 2000, Issue 2, Volume 1, Community Campus Partnerships for Health, San Francisco, CA. http://depts.washington.edu/ccph/principles.html#principles | ||
| Freyder, P. and T. O'Toole, Principle 2: The relationship between partners is characterized by mutual trust, respect, genuineness, and commitment, In Seifer, S.D. and Connors, K. (eds), Partnership Perspectives, 2000, Issue 2, Volume 1, Community Campus Partnerships for Health, San Francisco, CA. http://depts.washington.edu/ccph/principles.html#principles | ||
| Heady, H, Principle 9: Partnerships take time to develop and evolve over time, In: Seifer, S.D. and Connors, K. (eds),Partnership Perspectives, 2000, Issue 2, Volume 1, Community Campus Partnerships for Health, San Francisco, CA. http://depts.washington.edu/ccph/principles.html#principles | ||
| Herman, J. and E. Moore, Principle 8: Partners share the credit for the partnership's accomplishments, In Seifer, S.D. and Connors, K. (eds), Partnership Perspectives, 2000, Issue 2, Volume 1, Community Campus Partnerships for Health, San Francisco, CA. http://depts.washington.edu/ccph/principles.html#principles | ||
| Holland, B.A., Characteristics of 'Engaged Institutions' and
Sustainable Partnerships, and Effective Strategies for Change,
2000. The engaged institution is committed to direct interaction with external constituencies and communities through the mutually-beneficial exchange, exploration, and application of knowledge, expertise and information. These interactions enrich and expand the learning and discovery functions of the academic institution while also enhancing community capacity. The work of the engaged campus is responsive to community-identified needs, opportunities and goals in ways that are appropriate in the campus' mission and academic strengths. The interaction also builds greater public understanding of the role of the campus as a knowledge asset and resource. Characteristics of an engaged campus and sustainable partnerships, as well as lessons on partnership and institutional sustainability are summarized. | ||
| Huppert, M., Principle 6: Roles, norms and processes for the partnership are established with the input and agreement of all partners, In Seifer, S.D. and Connors, K. (eds), Partnership Perspectives, 2000, Issue 2, Volume 1, Community Campus Partnerships for Health, San Francisco, CA. http://depts.washington.edu/ccph/principles.html#principles | ||
| Inkster, R. and R. Ross, The Internship as Partnership: A
Handbook for Campus-Based Coordinators & Advisors, National
Society for Experiential Education, 1998. Covers the fundamentals of designing, monitoring, and evaluating internship programs, as well as an exploration of the theory and rationale of internships as effective educational practice. Includes sample forms from campus-based programs. | ||
| Inkster, R. and R. Ross, The Internship as Partnership: A
Handbook for Businesses, Nonprofits, and Government Agencies,
National Society for Experiential Education, 1998. This book is based on the belief that internships are a three-way partnership between the school or college, the student, and the host organization, and has been written especially for businesses or nonprofits considering starting an internship program or currently offering internships. | ||
| Jacoby, B., Building Service Learning Partnerships, San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2003-in press. This forthcoming full-length book is about the partnerships that are required to support strong and effective service-learning. In this volume, the contributors address the challenges and benefits of developing and sustaining partnerships between university departments, community agencies and corporations. | ||
| Lasker, R.D., Maximizing the Power of Partnerships: A
Team-Based Workshop, Introductory presentation at the Community
Campus Partnerships for Health Conference, Miami, FL, 2002. Drawing on a review of the literature on community partnership and community-institutional partnerships, Lasker defines and further describes partnerships including the notion of synergy, the 'who and how' of partnerships, including leadership and management, the role and value of synergistic partnerships and concludes with a summary of the partnership self-assessment tool and its utility. http://www.futurehealth.ucsf.edu/pdf_files/ccph2002.pdf | ||
| Maurana, C.A. and K. Goldenberg, A successful
academic-community partnership to improve the public's health,
Acad Med, 1996, 71(5), 425-431. The authors describe a successful approach that involves a close partnership between the health professions schools at two academic institutions, and agencies from the surrounding community. The Center for Healthy Communities, begun in 1991 and formally institutionalized at Wright State University (Dayton, Ohio) is a partnership among the schools of medicine, nursing and psychology. The authors explain how the center was formed, list its goals, review three underlying principles crucial to the success of the Center, and discuss the major difficulties that the community and academic institutions encountered along with strategies for meeting them. The authors maintain that a successful community-academic partnership must be built on the foundation of community health development. | ||
| McMillan, J. and T. Saddington, Service learning
partnerships as a catalyst for higher education transformation:
reflections on a South African University Initiative,
University of Capetown, South Africa. Paper presented at the
National Society for Experiential Education Conference, San
Antonio, Texas, December, 2000. Higher education transformation is a complex process-particularly when universities begin to engage with new constituencies and partners. The University of Capetown (UCT) received a grant to explore the potential of service learning in the context of community-higher education partnerships (CHESP). Central to program components is the development of partnerships between historically disadvantaged communities, higher educational institutions and the service sector so as to meet the twin goals of addressing these communities and supporting the transformation of higher education institutions in relation to these priorities. The paper explores the program goals and components, including reviewing complexities of establishing partnerships, and interviews and related reflections of core group members. | ||
| Pickeral, T. and K. Peters, Campus-Community Collaborations:
Models and Resources for Community Colleges, Campus Compact
National Center for Community Colleges, AZ, 1996. This sourcebook is part of the Center's strategy to provide technical assistance to community colleges and their partners throughout the nation. It describes models for developing effective partnerships. Major areas that are examined include community college collaborations with social agencies, K-12, four-year institutions, business and industry, and National Service programs. This guide provides an extensive bibliography on collaborations, and examines models from more than a dozen community colleges. | ||
| Nitschke-Shaw, D., and T. Pickeral, K-H Partnerships Tool
Kit, Campus Compact of New Hampshire, 2000. The focus of this publication is development and support of K-12 school partnerships with higher education institutions. The Tool Kit includes: elements of effective K-H partnerships, resources for developing these partnerships and activities to sustain them. This publication is valuable for both existing and developing K-H partnerships. | ||
| Quinn, S.C., D. Gamble and A. Denham, Ethics and
community-based education: balancing respect for the community with
professional preparation, Family & Community Health,
Jan 2001, 23(4), 9-23. As students enter the community, several ethical dilemmas arise regarding the university's interaction with the community. This article explores clinical, agency, and community placements in terms of the relationships they engender between the university and the community. The article then outlines some ethical obligations of universities and faculty members and ethical dilemmas that arise in different placements. Finally, a fundamental ethical framework that may guide universities and faculty members in planning community-based educational experiences is proposed. | ||
|
Royer, K., Strengthening collaboration between higher
education and communities: lessons shared by community partners in
service learning, Indianapolis, IN: Campus Compact Dialogue
Series Publication, 2000. This publication is the product of the 1999 community writing summit, in which community service learning partners gathered to consider campus-community partnerships and the ingredients necessary to establish, build, and sustain them. The publication is designed to be responsive to the needs of potential community partners, to fill a void in the body of service learning literature tailored to community organizations, and to be consulted by institutions of higher education looking to recruit or support community partners. | ||
| Sandmann, L.R. and C.A. Baker-Clark, Characteristics and
Principles of Community Partnerships: A Delphi Study,
1997. A three-tiered Delphi survey was used to examine principles of engagement for university-community partnerships. Panelists identified factors contributing to the establishment and maintenance of university-community partnerships, as well as to the preparation of faculty involved in such collaborations, which are reviewed in this article. | ||
| Sebastian, J., J. Skelton and K. West, Principle 7: There is feedback to, among and from all stakeholders in the partnership, with the goal of continuously improving the partnership and its outcomes, In Seifer, S.D. and K. Connors(eds), Partnership Perspectives, 2000, Issue 2, Volume 1, Community Campus Partnerships for Health, San Francisco, CA. http://depts.washington.edu/ccph/principles.html#principles | ||
| Seifer, S. and C. Maurana, Developing and sustaining
community-campus partnerships: putting principles into
practice, In Seifer, S.D. and K. Connors (eds), Partnership
Perspectives, 2000, Issue 2, Volume 1, Community Campus
Partnerships for Health, San Francisco, CA. Community Campus Partnerships for Health (CCPH) has articulated nine principles to help facilitate and strengthen partnerships between communities and higher educational institutions. This Partnership Perspectives volume concludes with lessons learned from national and local initiatives about building and sustaining community-campus partnerships. http://www.futurehealth.ucsf.edu/pdf_files/PubList.pdf | ||
| Sen, Gupta I., Principle 5: There is clear, open and accessible communication between partners, making it an ongoing priority to listen to each need; develop a common language, and validate / clarify the meaning of terms, In Seifer, S.D. and K. Connors (eds), Partnership Perspectives, 2000, Issue 2, Volume 1, Community Campus Partnerships for Health, San Francisco, CA. http://depts.washington.edu/ccph/principles.html#principles | ||
| Sigmon, R., Building sustainable partnerships: linking communities and educational institutions, National Society for Experiential Education, 2000. | ||
| Online Resources | ||
| Campus Compact Resources for Community Colleges | ||
| Community-Campus Partnerships for Health (CCPH) Resources on Community-Campus Partnerships | ||
| CCPH Principles
of Partnerships Search for "Nine Principles." Includes 9 principles of partnership, along with downloadable access to resources related to each principle. | ||
| Community Partnership Evaluation Tool | ||
| Inventory of Service-Learning Partnership | ||
| Powerpoint Presentation (2002): 'Maximizing the Power of Partnerships' | ||
| Powerpoint Presentation (2000): 'What makes partnerships successful?' | ||
| Tool for building partnerships into all aspects of service learning | ||
| Tool for Service Learning Sustainability | ||








