Reflection in Higher Education Service-Learning
| Print Version (882K pdf) | ||
| Source: K. Connors and S. D. Seifer, Community-Campus Partnerships for Health, September 2005, updated Zahra Ahmed, Liz Hutter, and Julie Plaut, Campus Compact, September 2008. For additional resources on this and other service-learning topics visit Learn and Serve America's National Service-Learning Clearinghouse at www.servicelearning.org. |
||
| Critical, structured reflection is essential to high-quality service-learning. Reflection activities guide students toward discovering, exploring, and evaluating relationships between the course content as they encounter it in readings, lectures, and discussions, and their experiences in the community. Reflection thus ensures service-learning is a dynamic, integrative process that develops students' knowledge, skills, and judgment. This fact sheet highlights key principles, identifies useful resources, and suggests reflection activities that can be modified for courses across the curriculum. | ||
| What Reflection Is and Is Not | ||
| While the term reflection is interpreted and practiced in many different ways in higher education, when done well: | ||
| ||
| ||
| The Theory Behind Reflection | ||
| Many service-learning practitioners refer to David Kolb's experiential learning cycle (1984), which details the ongoing interaction of four elements: concrete experience, observation and reflection about the experience, formation of abstract concepts through synthesis of the experience, and testing these concepts in new situations. Students may enter the experiential learning cycle at any point, which thus accommodates multiple learning styles. High-quality reflection in service-learning also contributes to the creation of educational environments that support the success of students from what Roberto Ibarra calls "high-context cultures" (2001). These cultures tend to draw on multiple streams of information surrounding an event, situation, or interaction in order to determine its meaning; cues may come from tones of voice as well as words, gestures, body language, and the relationship or status of the speakers. Since the dominant academic culture at most higher education institutions is distinctly low-context and increasing numbers of students come from high-context cultures, service-learning that invites students to reflect on and address multiple aspects of their community and classroom experiences is a promising strategy for engaging and retaining a diverse student population. |
||
| Key Characteristics of High-Quality Reflection | ||
| The classic Practitioner's Guide to Reflection in Service-Learning by Janet Eyler, Dwight E. Giles Jr., and Angela Schmiede, emphasizes four principles, often referred to as "the four C's": | ||
| ||
| For a more detailed discussion, including references and documentation, see the complete online fact sheet at www.servicelearning.org/instant_info/fact_sheets/he_facts/he_reflection/expanded.php | ||
| © 2008 Learn and Serve America's National Service-Learning Clearinghouse. Photocopying for nonprofit educational purposes is permitted. |
||
Suggested Citation:
Ahmed, Z., L. Hutter, and J. Plaut. Reflection in Higher Education Service-Learning. Scotts Valley, CA: Learn and Serve America’s National Service-Learning Clearinghouse, 2005/2008.
http://www.servicelearning.org/instant_info/fact_sheets/he_facts/he_reflection/


